The Paradox of Self-Discipline
Posted: January 26, 2010 at 9:35 pm in cognition, journal ~ Permalink ~ TrackBack

I was listening to the Fresh Air interview with Jonah Lehrer, author of
How We Decide, and he mentioned an experiment that seems relevant to me right now.

Lehrer describes the experiment in a Wall Street Journal article about New Year’s Resolutions:

In one experiment, led by Baba Shiv at Stanford University, several dozen undergraduates were divided into two groups. One group was given a two-digit number to remember, while the second group was given a seven-digit number. Then they were told to walk down the hall, where they were presented with two different snack options: a slice of chocolate cake or a bowl of fruit salad.

Here’s where the results get weird. The students with seven digits to remember were nearly twice as likely to choose the cake as students given two digits. The reason, according to Prof. Shiv, is that those extra numbers took up valuable space in the brain—they were a “cognitive load”—making it that much harder to resist a decadent dessert. In other words, willpower is so weak, and the prefrontal cortex is so overtaxed, that all it takes is five extra bits of information before the brain starts to give in to temptation.

In other words, the brain is not capable of making good decisions when overtaxed. For instance, if one were working long hours at Google, one’s ability to come home and exert the self-discipline necessary to write a blog post instead of flipping on the TV would be impaired. Just as a theoretical example.

The unfortunate implication of this, and the basis for this post’s title, is that it is those times when one is stressed that one most needs the ability to make good decisions. When I get overloaded at work, I get tunnel vision and start focusing mechanically on the tasks assigned to me, rather than taking the time to figure out what’s actually important and working on that. I also make other bad decisions like drinking more soda, skipping the gym, eating chips and cookies at work, and watching TV instead of sleeping. And, of course, those behaviors make me even less efficient, which means work takes even longer, which means the behavior perpetuates itself.

As an aside, breaking the cycle required a full two weeks of doing nothing over the holidays plus a couple weeks of a “normal” work week for me to rebuild my reserves to where I felt capable of blogging again. Now that I’m keeping more reasonable hours at work, I go to the gym, I’m eating better, and I’m even excited about blogging in the evening.

So how do we avoid this paradox? It seems to me that the bad behaviors like TV and junk food are always lurking in temptation for me, and the good behaviors like hitting the gym and writing blog posts require self-discipline. Part of it is building desired behaviors into habits that I do without questioning: successful examples of that for me include biking to work and flossing while unsuccessful ones include daily situps and pushups, hitting the gym regularly and blogging. Others have success by using a game of sorts where badges are earned for performing the desired behaviors, but I have trouble taking such games seriously.

Another weapon I have is simply self-awareness. If I consciously remind myself that I’m making bad decisions when I’m overloaded, it will hopefully make me question those decisions as I’m making them e.g. putting back the Oreos from the snack area at work and grabbing an apple instead. It’s helpful for me to treat my mind and body as systems that I can learn to optimize and compensate for, like having a tool that one has learned to use despite its quirky tendencies.

An extension of that last tactic is the one the WSJ article suggests, which is building up the muscles of self-discipline. Rather than doing lots of things at once, it would be better to focus my energy on building one habit, and only start on a new behavior when the first has become automatic. Right now, I’m splitting that self-discipline energy between work, going to the gym a few times a week, and blogging more regularly, so if I find myself slipping, I’ll have to prioritize more effectively. I need to recognize that my self-discipline is limited and deploy it in the most effective way until it gets stronger, rather than exhausting it to the point where I don’t do anything.

Anyway, given my struggles with work-life balance, I wanted to mention this experiment and how I perceive it as being relevant to my life. What tactics do you use to develop new habits?

P.S. I’ll be in Boston from Feb. 6-10 and New York from Feb. 11-14, with the timing chosen so that I could attend Grant McCracken’s Chief Culture Officer Boot Camp, but that’s just the cover reason for me to catch up with friends on the East Coast. Let me know if you want to meet up.

Previous: The Talent Code, by Daniel Coyle | Next: Getting the reps




  1. seppo commented on January 27th, 2010 at 12:52 pm :

    What you need is a game like Lose/Lose, where if you fail to meet your goals, the game arbitrarily deletes a file from your computer. That’ll make you take it seriously.

    :|

  2. Eric commented on January 27th, 2010 at 1:00 pm :

    Bah, everything of mine is stored in the “cloud” now. Well, okay, not music yet, but everything else.

    Now if it cut off my internet time, that might be a deterrent (and force me to do these offline things).

  3. steph commented on January 27th, 2010 at 1:23 pm :

    I’m reminded of a couple of things that might be tactics I use. :)

    The first was when I started meditating. Our instructor told us for the first week to set a goal, and to pick for that goal something that we knew would be attainable. (Take your first impulse and halve it, if necessary.) The theory was to start small, and build slowly, because we were not just building the habit of meditating every day (or 3 days a week, or whatever our individual goals were), we were building up a trusting in ourselves.

    The other thing I’m reminded of is how much of a difference shifting my inner dialogues away from judgment and toward compassion has made in my ability to break that kind of nasty cycle. So that when I’m doing worse than I’d like to at taking care of myself, I’m not also beating myself up for not making better choices and thus perpetuating the cycle. Compassion is not a quick fix, but I see parallels between the quality of choices I make under stress and the amount of compassion I have for myself.

    In any case, I’m enjoying your more frequent posting, and I’m glad it’s coming about because you’re getting more work-life balance these days. :)

  4. seppo commented on January 27th, 2010 at 2:01 pm :

    I think one of the bigger things that’s been harder to wrap my head around re: decision-making is not to think about things as… having momentum.

    Like, right now, I’m trying to eat better. There are times when I fall off the wagon, and it’s hard to not say, “Fuck it! Ice cream!” and instead say that a failure isn’t part of a trend toward failure, and that I should just treat the individual decision as a failure, and continue a trend toward success.

    The problem with that is that thinking about it in the other way is better when you’re succeeding – you don’t want to break up good momentum, and sometimes the desire to maintain that momentum is the thing that drags your sorry ass to the gym.

    I dunno. :P

  5. Beemer commented on January 27th, 2010 at 2:16 pm :

    The last time I was really stressed out, I remember consciously thinking “I am way too stressed to attempt to eat healthy today”. I just did not have the mental resources.

    I think one of the best tools for avoiding bad decisions due to overtaxed resources is to try and arrange one’s life so as to minimize periods of sustained stress.

  6. chrisdumler commented on February 9th, 2010 at 5:50 pm :

    I like how you reference self-awareness in your posts (and have for a long time). It seems like this is somehow neglected or, at least, uncommon among many people. Yet it seems to be a critical ingredient to making change more sustainable.

    You should be wrapping up the CCO Bootcamp. I’ll be looking forward to your thoughts about it. : )

  7. Ella commented on February 28th, 2010 at 4:00 pm :

    Eric, I can totally relate to this. For the past year I’ve been running around in highly complex loops because I had no “mental” space for making things more efficient. Sometimes a loop should be just a circle.

  8. Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist || How We Decide, by Jonah Lehrer || April || 2010 commented on April 1st, 2010 at 7:19 am :

    [...] as they are based in logic. Its weaknesses are that it is slow and has limited capacity (check out his anecdote on self-control when trying to remember too many things), and therefore works best on well-defined problems with only a few dimensions to [...]

 

Speak up!

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic.
Allowed tags: <a href=""> <blockquote> <code> <em> <strong>