<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political burnout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2008/01/02/political-burnout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2008/01/02/political-burnout/</link>
	<description>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2008/01/02/political-burnout/comment-page-1/#comment-117616</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2008/01/02/political-burnout/#comment-117616</guid>
		<description>I think if we truly had a representative democracy where we trusted our representatives to do the research and make the right decisions for us, then it&#039;d be fine.  But everybody just wants what&#039;s best for them and don&#039;t understand some of the compromises necessary, so they think their rep does a bad job and wants to overrule them.  

I once suggested on eit that attending a single city council meeting in the year prior should be a requirement for voting.  I figured everybody has 24 hours in a day, so that was fair.  If you can&#039;t make time for an hour or two to attend a meeting, you clearly don&#039;t have the time or initiative to stay educated on major issues.  I was accused of wanting to institute a new poll tax.  &lt;sigh&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if we truly had a representative democracy where we trusted our representatives to do the research and make the right decisions for us, then it&#8217;d be fine.  But everybody just wants what&#8217;s best for them and don&#8217;t understand some of the compromises necessary, so they think their rep does a bad job and wants to overrule them.  </p>
<p>I once suggested on eit that attending a single city council meeting in the year prior should be a requirement for voting.  I figured everybody has 24 hours in a day, so that was fair.  If you can&#8217;t make time for an hour or two to attend a meeting, you clearly don&#8217;t have the time or initiative to stay educated on major issues.  I was accused of wanting to institute a new poll tax.  <sigh></sigh></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beemer</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2008/01/02/political-burnout/comment-page-1/#comment-117614</link>
		<dc:creator>Beemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2008/01/02/political-burnout/#comment-117614</guid>
		<description>We had a discussion on Sunday night that really got my contrarian streak going, and my conclusion of the moment is that universal suffrage is actually a bad idea.

What we should have instead is suffrage based on a combination of being affected by the decision and competence to make a good decision in that venue.

How do you implement that and still ensure a reasonable minimum level of justice?  I have no idea.  But I think our big problem at the moment is that people don&#039;t have the resources to make good decisions in a directly democratic way (and some people will never have those resources), and representative democracy doesn&#039;t seem to mix well with mass media.

I dunno, maybe we just need a parliament instead of a congress...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a discussion on Sunday night that really got my contrarian streak going, and my conclusion of the moment is that universal suffrage is actually a bad idea.</p>
<p>What we should have instead is suffrage based on a combination of being affected by the decision and competence to make a good decision in that venue.</p>
<p>How do you implement that and still ensure a reasonable minimum level of justice?  I have no idea.  But I think our big problem at the moment is that people don&#8217;t have the resources to make good decisions in a directly democratic way (and some people will never have those resources), and representative democracy doesn&#8217;t seem to mix well with mass media.</p>
<p>I dunno, maybe we just need a parliament instead of a congress&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

