<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why social software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/</link>
	<description>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Defending Twitter and Facebook status updates &#124;&#124; February &#124;&#124; 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-139063</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Defending Twitter and Facebook status updates &#124;&#124; February &#124;&#124; 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/#comment-139063</guid>
		<description>[...] found myself defending them as useful (which is interesting because six months previously, I said I &#8220;dislike the minimal information content transmitted via Facebook status messages or Twitter m...). Other people couldn&#8217;t understand the point of posting one line updates about oneself to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found myself defending them as useful (which is interesting because six months previously, I said I &#8220;dislike the minimal information content transmitted via Facebook status messages or Twitter m&#8230;). Other people couldn&#8217;t understand the point of posting one line updates about oneself to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Balanced socializing &#124;&#124; January &#124;&#124; 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-118428</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Balanced socializing &#124;&#124; January &#124;&#124; 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/#comment-118428</guid>
		<description>[...] are inspiring but somewhat exhausting, whereas the shallower social interactions provide the phatic communication that maintains social connections. I think either one alone would be unfulfilling, but the mix [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are inspiring but somewhat exhausting, whereas the shallower social interactions provide the phatic communication that maintains social connections. I think either one alone would be unfulfilling, but the mix [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-72145</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/#comment-72145</guid>
		<description>Beemer: Interesting point about the shortest posts eliciting the most comments.  I&#039;ve had people tell me that they want a &quot;I liked this post&quot; button on my blog posts so they can indicate that they read and appreciated the post without feeling they had to come up with a well-written and thoughtful comment in reply.  Whereas a one line &quot;Hi!&quot; post starts a conversation where the perceived barrier to entry is much lower.

Jenn: Twitter&#039;s just instant messaging spread over a few communication channels.  Think zephyr and the white-magic instance where people would post &quot;Hey, anybody going to Lobdell&#039;s?&quot; and things like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beemer: Interesting point about the shortest posts eliciting the most comments.  I&#8217;ve had people tell me that they want a &#8220;I liked this post&#8221; button on my blog posts so they can indicate that they read and appreciated the post without feeling they had to come up with a well-written and thoughtful comment in reply.  Whereas a one line &#8220;Hi!&#8221; post starts a conversation where the perceived barrier to entry is much lower.</p>
<p>Jenn: Twitter&#8217;s just instant messaging spread over a few communication channels.  Think zephyr and the white-magic instance where people would post &#8220;Hey, anybody going to Lobdell&#8217;s?&#8221; and things like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-72064</link>
		<dc:creator>jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/#comment-72064</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that I still don&#039;t understand the Twitter thing.  I get LinkedIn and LJ and (ugh) MySpace (all three of which actually address separate groups of friends/colleagues/family), but Twitter?  Totally lost on me.  I&#039;ve found my digital divide, I guess...

What the hell is it for, anyhow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I still don&#8217;t understand the Twitter thing.  I get LinkedIn and LJ and (ugh) MySpace (all three of which actually address separate groups of friends/colleagues/family), but Twitter?  Totally lost on me.  I&#8217;ve found my digital divide, I guess&#8230;</p>
<p>What the hell is it for, anyhow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beemer</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-71790</link>
		<dc:creator>Beemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/08/11/why-social-software/#comment-71790</guid>
		<description>This seems like it ought to tie in with the fact that LJ posts that say nothing more than &quot;I like cookies&quot; or &quot;Hi&quot; will often get far more comments than a well-written and thought-provoking essay.

Many of the party attendees up hyar in Canadia have LJ accounts, so ambient intimacy (aka &#039;peripheral awareness&#039;) has been brought up a few times.

Something interesting to be said about matching up online acquaintances with actual in-person people, but I&#039;m not up to it tonight.

Phat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like it ought to tie in with the fact that LJ posts that say nothing more than &#8220;I like cookies&#8221; or &#8220;Hi&#8221; will often get far more comments than a well-written and thought-provoking essay.</p>
<p>Many of the party attendees up hyar in Canadia have LJ accounts, so ambient intimacy (aka &#8216;peripheral awareness&#8217;) has been brought up a few times.</p>
<p>Something interesting to be said about matching up online acquaintances with actual in-person people, but I&#8217;m not up to it tonight.</p>
<p>Phat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

