<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiction Roundup May 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/05/20/fiction-roundup-may-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/05/20/fiction-roundup-may-2007/</link>
	<description>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Fiction Roundup Sept. 2008 &#8211; April 2010 &#124;&#124; April &#124;&#124; 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/05/20/fiction-roundup-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-317219</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Fiction Roundup Sept. 2008 &#8211; April 2010 &#124;&#124; April &#124;&#124; 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/05/20/fiction-roundup-may-2007/#comment-317219</guid>
		<description>[...] picked this up based on Seth Godin&#8217;s recommendation after enjoying the previous novels he&#8217;d recommended. It wasn&#8217;t until after I got this from the library that I realized I&#8217;d read Matt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] picked this up based on Seth Godin&#8217;s recommendation after enjoying the previous novels he&#8217;d recommended. It wasn&#8217;t until after I got this from the library that I realized I&#8217;d read Matt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/05/20/fiction-roundup-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-50091</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/05/20/fiction-roundup-may-2007/#comment-50091</guid>
		<description>Chbosky went to my high school--that&#039;s why I picked it up initially. It&#039;s a decent book and it&#039;s cool that I know Pat, who was mentioned in the acknowledgements and I knew some of the teachers in the book. A bit weird, really. 

I like the High Fidelity book. Quick and enjoyable read, though I don&#039;t necessarily think it&#039;s better than the book. 

I liked the two or three episodes of Love Monkey that aired on CBS before it got yanked and I&#039;ve thought about getting the book. I&#039;m not sure that your &quot;recommendation&quot; sways me towards it, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chbosky went to my high school&#8211;that&#8217;s why I picked it up initially. It&#8217;s a decent book and it&#8217;s cool that I know Pat, who was mentioned in the acknowledgements and I knew some of the teachers in the book. A bit weird, really. </p>
<p>I like the High Fidelity book. Quick and enjoyable read, though I don&#8217;t necessarily think it&#8217;s better than the book. </p>
<p>I liked the two or three episodes of Love Monkey that aired on CBS before it got yanked and I&#8217;ve thought about getting the book. I&#8217;m not sure that your &#8220;recommendation&#8221; sways me towards it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/05/20/fiction-roundup-may-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-45903</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/05/20/fiction-roundup-may-2007/#comment-45903</guid>
		<description>Regarding your comments on &lt;i&gt;Intuition&lt;/i&gt;, I have been enjoying Kim Stanley Robinson&#039;s newest series for similar reasons. A bunch of scientists and other people in DC trying to figure out how to move the behemoth that is the US govt into acting to slow/stop climate change. The first book is &lt;i&gt;Forty Signs of Rain&lt;/i&gt;. 

I&#039;d say the biggest weakness is Robinson&#039;s tendency to make his characters archetypes instead of people. Kind of like Arthur Clarke tended to do. That, and the really unlikely love plot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your comments on <i>Intuition</i>, I have been enjoying Kim Stanley Robinson&#8217;s newest series for similar reasons. A bunch of scientists and other people in DC trying to figure out how to move the behemoth that is the US govt into acting to slow/stop climate change. The first book is <i>Forty Signs of Rain</i>. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say the biggest weakness is Robinson&#8217;s tendency to make his characters archetypes instead of people. Kind of like Arthur Clarke tended to do. That, and the really unlikely love plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

