<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/</link>
	<description>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; The Talent Code, by Daniel Coyle &#124;&#124; January &#124;&#124; 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/comment-page-1/#comment-305523</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; The Talent Code, by Daniel Coyle &#124;&#124; January &#124;&#124; 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/#comment-305523</guid>
		<description>[...] practice &#8211; I&#8217;ve also heard it called deliberate practice. This is the kind of practice that is referred to in the &#8220;10,000 hour rule&#8221; popularized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] practice &#8211; I&#8217;ve also heard it called deliberate practice. This is the kind of practice that is referred to in the &#8220;10,000 hour rule&#8221; popularized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Mastery &#124;&#124; May &#124;&#124; 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/comment-page-1/#comment-47496</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Mastery &#124;&#124; May &#124;&#124; 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/#comment-47496</guid>
		<description>[...] to get to that next level. And the iterations can&#8217;t be done mindlessly - you have to know what results you are planning to achieve. To push through those iterations requires a level of passion, a desire to be the best. Passion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to get to that next level. And the iterations can&#8217;t be done mindlessly &#8211; you have to know what results you are planning to achieve. To push through those iterations requires a level of passion, a desire to be the best. Passion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; The Discordant Element &#124;&#124; March &#124;&#124; 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/comment-page-1/#comment-27944</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; The Discordant Element &#124;&#124; March &#124;&#124; 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/#comment-27944</guid>
		<description>[...] Getting results [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Getting results [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Semel</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/comment-page-1/#comment-21474</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Semel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/#comment-21474</guid>
		<description>This definitely works in your personal life as well as in business.  When I set myself to paying attention to certain aspects of life (by writing them down and measuring them), I find those goals take care of themselves, whereas the ones I don&#039;t pay attention to, or don&#039;t commit to writing and measuring, don&#039;t progress at all, even if I think about them and strongly desire them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This definitely works in your personal life as well as in business.  When I set myself to paying attention to certain aspects of life (by writing them down and measuring them), I find those goals take care of themselves, whereas the ones I don&#8217;t pay attention to, or don&#8217;t commit to writing and measuring, don&#8217;t progress at all, even if I think about them and strongly desire them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/comment-page-1/#comment-21411</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/#comment-21411</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  A post appears to have disappeared into the ether...

Regarding Beemer&#039;s post: I love what you say about the generalist/specialist division.  Keep that meme alive, man.  It&#039;s going to come back to us; I just know it.

Also, to pithily summarize your other point: &quot;Experience is what you get when you don&#039;t get what you want.&quot;  Google says that Don (or Dan) Stanford originated this quote.  All I know is that I&#039;ve used it for years, and I wish it were more widely circulated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  A post appears to have disappeared into the ether&#8230;</p>
<p>Regarding Beemer&#8217;s post: I love what you say about the generalist/specialist division.  Keep that meme alive, man.  It&#8217;s going to come back to us; I just know it.</p>
<p>Also, to pithily summarize your other point: &#8220;Experience is what you get when you don&#8217;t get what you want.&#8221;  Google says that Don (or Dan) Stanford originated this quote.  All I know is that I&#8217;ve used it for years, and I wish it were more widely circulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/comment-page-1/#comment-21406</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/#comment-21406</guid>
		<description>Ah.  One other thing.  You mentioned the idea of &lt;i&gt;spend(ing) five minutes a day writing in a personal journal.&lt;/i&gt;

This is a variation on the theme I first was introduced to in Julia Cameron&#039;s excellent book &lt;i&gt;The Artist&#039;s Way&lt;/i&gt; in which she advocates as part of her program writing three pages a morning.  Any pages at all, but fill &#039;em up.  Truly excellent practice, and one I really ought to re-adopt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah.  One other thing.  You mentioned the idea of <i>spend(ing) five minutes a day writing in a personal journal.</i></p>
<p>This is a variation on the theme I first was introduced to in Julia Cameron&#8217;s excellent book <i>The Artist&#8217;s Way</i> in which she advocates as part of her program writing three pages a morning.  Any pages at all, but fill &#8216;em up.  Truly excellent practice, and one I really ought to re-adopt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/comment-page-1/#comment-21401</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/#comment-21401</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m delighted to be referenced in this post.  I&#039;m also delighted to find that we have found an area of thought in which we&#039;ve both walked more or less the same footsteps.  

Some related thoughts, roughly in the order in which your post triggered them:

&lt;i&gt;...part of the reason I was leaving programming was that I didnâ€™t have passion for it, and because of that, I was never going to be great at it.&lt;/i&gt;

I made this exact same observation about myself the better part of a decade ago, and it ultimately resulted in my life getting enormously better.  Though my &quot;current job&quot; doesn&#039;t pay as well as the sorts of jobs I&#039;d have were I to have stayed on the track I was on ten years ago, that is in itself a misleading statement, since I would not have maneuvered into those jobs regardless; they are not sufficiently interesting to me for me to have given their pursuit my full attention and ability.  And that says nothing of the relative lack of happiness I&#039;d have enjoyed had I forced myself to follow that path as best I could.  

By contrast, I spend a WHOLE lot of time and energy on my current pursuits, and that suits me fine.  Honestly, I feel rather spoiled.  I spend large swaths of time and energy doing things that look for all the world like &quot;screwing around.&quot;  But it doesn&#039;t take much of a shift in perspective (and a little bit of good ad copy) to recast those activities as extraordinarily productive and valuable to both community and pocketbook.

Your reference to &lt;i&gt;deliberate practice&lt;/i&gt; reminds me of a recent Scientific American article which I have seen referenced many times recently, by content if not by name.  The idea is that ten years of what you call deliberate practice is a (and in fact the) necessary precursor to mastery in most fields.  This is an enormously powerful idea, I think, and I&#039;ll let it go at that (and will print a copy of the article for your personal use, as I scanned it at the time).

The &lt;i&gt;weekly personal scorecard&lt;/i&gt; is such obviously powerful mojo that I fear to use it.  What evil will I discover!?  Whose idea was it, and will you be my support group as I attempt to wield such potent magics for the first time?

Right on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m delighted to be referenced in this post.  I&#8217;m also delighted to find that we have found an area of thought in which we&#8217;ve both walked more or less the same footsteps.  </p>
<p>Some related thoughts, roughly in the order in which your post triggered them:</p>
<p><i>&#8230;part of the reason I was leaving programming was that I didnâ€™t have passion for it, and because of that, I was never going to be great at it.</i></p>
<p>I made this exact same observation about myself the better part of a decade ago, and it ultimately resulted in my life getting enormously better.  Though my &#8220;current job&#8221; doesn&#8217;t pay as well as the sorts of jobs I&#8217;d have were I to have stayed on the track I was on ten years ago, that is in itself a misleading statement, since I would not have maneuvered into those jobs regardless; they are not sufficiently interesting to me for me to have given their pursuit my full attention and ability.  And that says nothing of the relative lack of happiness I&#8217;d have enjoyed had I forced myself to follow that path as best I could.  </p>
<p>By contrast, I spend a WHOLE lot of time and energy on my current pursuits, and that suits me fine.  Honestly, I feel rather spoiled.  I spend large swaths of time and energy doing things that look for all the world like &#8220;screwing around.&#8221;  But it doesn&#8217;t take much of a shift in perspective (and a little bit of good ad copy) to recast those activities as extraordinarily productive and valuable to both community and pocketbook.</p>
<p>Your reference to <i>deliberate practice</i> reminds me of a recent Scientific American article which I have seen referenced many times recently, by content if not by name.  The idea is that ten years of what you call deliberate practice is a (and in fact the) necessary precursor to mastery in most fields.  This is an enormously powerful idea, I think, and I&#8217;ll let it go at that (and will print a copy of the article for your personal use, as I scanned it at the time).</p>
<p>The <i>weekly personal scorecard</i> is such obviously powerful mojo that I fear to use it.  What evil will I discover!?  Whose idea was it, and will you be my support group as I attempt to wield such potent magics for the first time?</p>
<p>Right on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beemer</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/comment-page-1/#comment-21346</link>
		<dc:creator>Beemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2007/03/11/getting-results/#comment-21346</guid>
		<description>I had a meeting with folks at work on Friday about educational games, and one of the points I brought up is that failure is where the learning happens.  You don&#039;t learn anything by getting things right; you learn when you make a mistake and then figure out how to correct it.  (This is where many bad educational games go wrong; they&#039;re afraid to let players fail, which is exactly the benefit of a game: you can fail without negative consequences.)

Anyway, I wonder if that might be part of the generalist/specialist difference: specialists are more comfortable failing at an aspect of things they already have some skill with (and thereby polishing out their weaknesses), while generalists are more comfortable failing at things they have no skill with (and thereby filling in their deficiencies).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a meeting with folks at work on Friday about educational games, and one of the points I brought up is that failure is where the learning happens.  You don&#8217;t learn anything by getting things right; you learn when you make a mistake and then figure out how to correct it.  (This is where many bad educational games go wrong; they&#8217;re afraid to let players fail, which is exactly the benefit of a game: you can fail without negative consequences.)</p>
<p>Anyway, I wonder if that might be part of the generalist/specialist difference: specialists are more comfortable failing at an aspect of things they already have some skill with (and thereby polishing out their weaknesses), while generalists are more comfortable failing at things they have no skill with (and thereby filling in their deficiencies).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

