<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information decay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/07/26/information-decay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/07/26/information-decay/</link>
	<description>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Transmedia conversations &#124;&#124; August &#124;&#124; 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/07/26/information-decay/comment-page-1/#comment-73222</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Transmedia conversations &#124;&#124; August &#124;&#124; 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/07/24/information-decay/#comment-73222</guid>
		<description>[...] since forgotten and I have no way of recovering it. I can see advantages to this form of built-in information decay, but I also think we will lose our history. I can&#8217;t imagine future historians being able to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] since forgotten and I have no way of recovering it. I can see advantages to this form of built-in information decay, but I also think we will lose our history. I can&#8217;t imagine future historians being able to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/07/26/information-decay/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/07/24/information-decay/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Except that con-thinkers (who may be a majority in America right now) use it as an excuse to hold back pro-thinkers.  So that part bothers me.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that con-thinkers (who may be a majority in America right now) use it as an excuse to hold back pro-thinkers.  So that part bothers me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beemer</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/07/26/information-decay/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Beemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/07/24/information-decay/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I agree.  It&#039;s a social problem, not a technological one.

(And since it causes more problems for con-thinkers than prog-thinkers, I don&#039;t mind leaving it unsolved by technical means, because I&#039;m spiteful that way.  Learn to cope with context, dammit!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  It&#8217;s a social problem, not a technological one.</p>
<p>(And since it causes more problems for con-thinkers than prog-thinkers, I don&#8217;t mind leaving it unsolved by technical means, because I&#8217;m spiteful that way.  Learn to cope with context, dammit!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

