<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More thoughts on thin-slicing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/02/25/more-thoughts-on-thin-slicing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/02/25/more-thoughts-on-thin-slicing/</link>
	<description>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Cognitive subroutines extensions &#124;&#124; March &#124;&#124; 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2005/02/25/more-thoughts-on-thin-slicing/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist &#124;&#124; Cognitive subroutines extensions &#124;&#124; March &#124;&#124; 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=273#comment-949</guid>
		<description>[...] In fact, this is really interesting, because it gets back to a question I asked at the end of this post, which was how to reconcile this theory with the ideas in Global Brain. By expanding the scope of the cognitive subroutines to include external influences and external controls, we then build in the power of the collective learning machine, because each of us will choose which elements of the external environment to leverage. Things that are useful, whether as mental constructs for easing cognitive processing or as physical artifacts for increasing our control, will get resources shifted towards them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In fact, this is really interesting, because it gets back to a question I asked at the end of this post, which was how to reconcile this theory with the ideas in Global Brain. By expanding the scope of the cognitive subroutines to include external influences and external controls, we then build in the power of the collective learning machine, because each of us will choose which elements of the external environment to leverage. Things that are useful, whether as mental constructs for easing cognitive processing or as physical artifacts for increasing our control, will get resources shifted towards them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

